Antique Car Claim Hits the Brakes: Home Insurance Does Not Cover Vehicle Damage

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The car owner had filed for the losses with his insurer, Allianz, under the impression that the stationary state of his classic automobile placed it outside the category of a motor vehicle, which would typically be excluded from home insurance coverage. The claim also included potential legal liabilities related to the damage inflicted upon the neighbor's property.

However, Allianz stood firm on the grounds of their policy, which explicitly excludes motor vehicles, setting the stage for AFCA’s involvement to help settle the matter. The authority consulted both dictionary and legal definitions during its adjudication to arrive at a conclusion.

The decision was crystal clear. Although the prized Mercedes was not road-ready, it was undeniably a car, designed for motor propulsion and fit for highway use. Conclusively, for all intents and purposes regarding the claim, the car was classified as a motor vehicle.

Additionally, the authority addressed the aspect of legal liability, stating that while it may have been a legitimate claim, the insurance policy in question conveniently draws a line, omitting any claims connected to the ownership or operation of a 'mechanically propelled vehicle.'

The underlying fact, as pointed out by AFCA, was that any car functions through mechanical propulsion, dovetailing with its design intent. Thus, the Mercedes, regardless of its non-functional state, was subject to the same rules, exempting the legal liability concerns from the policy's scope of coverage.

Despite the setback for the claimant in terms of coverage, AFCA noted an oversight by the insurer during its claims process. Allianz overlooked the policyholder's legal liability concerns without due consideration, an error that led to frustration and inconvenience for the customer. In light of this, AFCA has ruled that Allianz compensate the claimant with AUD 1,000 for non-financial losses sustained as a result of the claim handling process.

Published:Wednesday, 24th Apr 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

PSC Move Signals Stronger Competition in Transport Insurance Broking

07 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

PSC Insurance Brokers’ investment in MA Insurance Brokers is a timely reminder that specialist transport insurance advice is becoming increasingly valuable in a tighter, more complex market. The deal, announced in late June 2026, sees MA begin operating as PSC Transport Insurance Brokers, while founders Barry Mathison and Mariann Illyes retain an equity stake and continue leading the business as managing principals. - read more

QBE’s Trade Pack Change Puts Renewals in Focus for Tradies

07 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

QBE’s decision to stop offering its standalone office and trade pack products from July 2026 is a timely reminder for Australian tradies to treat every renewal as more than a simple rollover. The insurer is moving customers towards a standard business cover structure, with existing trade pack policyholders expected to be offered the replacement product at renewal from October 2026. - read more

Road User Charging Reform: What It Could Mean for Truck Operators

06 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Road user charging is moving from policy theory to a more serious industry conversation, with a new ITS Australia survey pointing to growing support for replacing fuel excise with a distance-based funding model. For transport operators, this is not just a tax discussion. It could change how fleets calculate running costs, compare vehicle types and plan margins on long-term freight contracts. - read more

Stolen Tools Ruling Shows Why Policy Limits Matter

06 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent Australian Financial Complaints Authority decision is a timely warning for trade businesses that rely on tools, trailers and mobile equipment every day. The dispute centred on a business that had tools and a trailer stolen from a worksite, then challenged the insurer’s payout after discovering the claim was limited by the portable items section of the policy. - read more

Adviser Levy Pressure Puts PI Reform Back in Focus

06 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The Financial Advice Association Australia has renewed pressure on the Federal Government to limit Compensation Scheme of Last Resort costs for financial advisers, arguing the profession should not carry more than $20 million in total levy exposure while adviser numbers remain under strain. - read more

Click for more Insurance News