Antique Car Claim Hits the Brakes: Home Insurance Does Not Cover Vehicle Damage

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The car owner had filed for the losses with his insurer, Allianz, under the impression that the stationary state of his classic automobile placed it outside the category of a motor vehicle, which would typically be excluded from home insurance coverage. The claim also included potential legal liabilities related to the damage inflicted upon the neighbor's property.

However, Allianz stood firm on the grounds of their policy, which explicitly excludes motor vehicles, setting the stage for AFCA’s involvement to help settle the matter. The authority consulted both dictionary and legal definitions during its adjudication to arrive at a conclusion.

The decision was crystal clear. Although the prized Mercedes was not road-ready, it was undeniably a car, designed for motor propulsion and fit for highway use. Conclusively, for all intents and purposes regarding the claim, the car was classified as a motor vehicle.

Additionally, the authority addressed the aspect of legal liability, stating that while it may have been a legitimate claim, the insurance policy in question conveniently draws a line, omitting any claims connected to the ownership or operation of a 'mechanically propelled vehicle.'

The underlying fact, as pointed out by AFCA, was that any car functions through mechanical propulsion, dovetailing with its design intent. Thus, the Mercedes, regardless of its non-functional state, was subject to the same rules, exempting the legal liability concerns from the policy's scope of coverage.

Despite the setback for the claimant in terms of coverage, AFCA noted an oversight by the insurer during its claims process. Allianz overlooked the policyholder's legal liability concerns without due consideration, an error that led to frustration and inconvenience for the customer. In light of this, AFCA has ruled that Allianz compensate the claimant with AUD 1,000 for non-financial losses sustained as a result of the claim handling process.

Published:Wednesday, 24th Apr 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Why Battery Freight Is Becoming a Truck Insurance Issue

10 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent transport and insurance industry attention on lithium-ion battery safety is a timely warning for Australian truck operators. The issue is no longer limited to consumer products catching fire in homes or warehouses. Batteries now move through freight networks in tools, scooters, e-bikes, electronics, spare parts and energy storage equipment, and that creates a different risk profile for carriers, depots and subcontracted linehaul work. - read more

Why Premium Differences Matter When Choosing Income Protection

09 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent income protection cost commentary has put a practical issue back in front of Australian workers: two policies that appear similar at first glance can carry very different long-term costs. For people relying on their income to meet mortgage repayments, rent, school fees, business expenses or family commitments, the premium is important, but it should not be viewed in isolation. - read more

Cyber Risk Is Blurring the Lines for Professional Indemnity Cover

09 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent insurance market commentary has again highlighted a growing challenge for Australian professional service firms: cyber incidents are no longer just an IT problem. When a system outage, data handling error, failed implementation, software defect or poor security recommendation causes a client financial loss, the dispute can quickly move into professional indemnity territory. - read more

Why Skipping Travel Insurance Can Be a Costly Saving

09 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent consumer reporting has again highlighted a familiar travel risk: some Australians are looking for savings by travelling without insurance, or by choosing the cheapest cover without checking whether it suits the trip. With airfares, accommodation and day-to-day holiday costs still stretching household budgets, it is understandable that travellers are scrutinising every expense. The problem is that travel insurance is often treated as optional until something goes wrong. - read more

Cyber Underinsurance Is Becoming a Bigger SME Risk

09 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry attention on cyber underinsurance is a timely reminder that many Australian small and medium businesses are still treating digital risk as an IT problem rather than a balance sheet risk. As more trading, payments, customer records, bookings and supplier relationships move online, a cyber incident can quickly become a cash flow, legal, operational and reputational event. - read more

Click for more Insurance News