Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
The Australian commercial insurance market has maintained its soft conditions through the first half of 2026, characterized by easing pricing across most lines and a broad insurer appetite. This trend is largely driven by heightened competition, expanded capacity, and stabilizing reinsurance conditions. - read more
The 2026-27 Federal Budget, presented by Treasurer Jim Chalmers, introduces several measures with direct implications for the Australian insurance industry. These include legislated natural hazard definitions and a doubled Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) prudential threshold. However, the budget also leaves certain areas unaddressed, such as disaster funding and the Hazards Insurance Partnership. - read more
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) have called for decisive action to address mounting sustainability pressures in the Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) insurance market. This call to action follows a high-level industry roundtable that brought together senior executives from 19 insurers and reinsurers, alongside representatives from Treasury and the Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI). - read more
Insurance Australia Group (IAG), a leading general insurer in Australia, has reported a net profit after tax of AU$505 million for the first half of the 2026 financial year. This performance demonstrates resilience in the face of severe seasonal weather events that impacted the industry during this period. - read more
In a significant development for the fitness industry, AUSactive has unveiled a new insurance product specifically designed for exercise and active health professionals. This initiative, developed in partnership with global insurance broker Marsh, aims to provide enhanced protection while offering lower premiums compared to existing market options. - read more
In the ever-unpredictable world of farming, crop insurance emerges as a pivotal ally for farmers, hedging against the myriad of risks that come with cultivating the land. As the first step to understanding this crucial safeguard, let's unfold the question: What is crop insurance, exactly? In essence, crop insurance is a type of cover designed to cushion farmers from financial losses due to unavoidable circumstances such as adverse weather conditions, pests, disease, or even market fluctuations. - read more
Keyperson insurance is a specialized type of business insurance designed to protect companies from the financial repercussions of losing a critically important team member. This type of insurance provides a payout that can help stabilize the business during the transition period following the loss of a key individual. In the context of farming, this might include someone who holds a unique skill set, deep agricultural knowledge, or critical business acumen that drives the success of the farm. - read more
Welcome to our discussion on farm insurance, a vital aspect for anyone involved in agriculture. Whether you run a smallholding or manage extensive agricultural operations, understanding your insurance coverage can make all the difference in safeguarding your livelihood. - read more
Welcome to our discussion on farm insurance, a crucial subject for every Australian farmer. Whether you're seasoned in agricultural ventures or just starting out, the world of insurance can often seem daunting and complex. - read more
Managing a farm involves juggling many uncertainties and potential risks. Risk management in farming refers to the process of identifying, assessing, and prioritising risks associated with agricultural activities. Effective risk management ensures that farmers can handle obstacles and continue their operations smoothly. - read more
Knowledgebase
Rider: An optional provision added to an insurance policy that provides additional benefits or coverage.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.