Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.

In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.

The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.

Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.

The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.

AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.

"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.

"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."

"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.

Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Cyclone Cover Debate Highlights Strata Insurance Pressure Points

12 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

The latest industry attention on Australia's cyclone reinsurance arrangements is a timely reminder that premium relief for strata schemes is rarely driven by one policy lever alone. The cyclone pool was designed to reduce insurer exposure to cyclone-related losses in higher-risk regions, particularly across northern Australia. However, for owners corporations and body corporates, the practical impact can still vary sharply from building to building. - read more

Why Apartment Defect Scrutiny Matters for Strata Insurance

12 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Renewed attention on apartment building defects is a timely reminder that strata insurance is not assessed in isolation from the physical condition of a scheme. For owners corporations and body corporates, the issue is not only whether cover is in place, but whether the building can be clearly presented to insurers as a well-managed and understood risk. - read more

Insurance Complaint Trends Put Policy Clarity Back in Focus

12 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh complaints data from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority has again put pressure on the general insurance sector, with policy disputes, delays and communication breakdowns remaining a major source of frustration for customers. For Australian tradies, the headline is not just that complaints are being lodged; it is that many disputes appear to begin with mismatched expectations between what a policyholder thought was covered and how the insurer interpreted the wording when a claim arrived. - read more

Insurance Complaint Trends Put Claims Discipline Back in Focus

12 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh attention on insurance complaints data is a timely warning for truck operators: the quality of your policy set-up and claim preparation can matter just as much as the premium you pay. While complaint volumes across insurance are influenced by many factors, including weather events, repair delays and affordability pressure, the practical lesson for transport businesses is clear. - read more

Why Battery Fire Risk Is Now on the Menu for Restaurants

12 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Renewed insurance industry attention on lithium-ion battery fires is a practical warning for Australian restaurants, cafes and takeaway venues. The risk is no longer limited to consumer gadgets at home. Many hospitality businesses now rely on battery-powered delivery equipment, cordless tools, portable payment devices, tablets, power banks and rechargeable cleaning equipment, often used across long trading hours and charged on site after closing. - read more

Click for more Insurance News