Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.

In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.

The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.

Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.

The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.

AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.

"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.

"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."

"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.

Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Longer Lives, Higher Claims: What Chronic Illness Means for Employers

15 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

New research from Zurich has sharpened the focus on a major issue for Australian employers: people are living longer, but many are spending more of those years managing chronic illness. For businesses that rely on experienced staff, directors and key revenue-generating employees, this is not just a health trend. It is a workforce, productivity and insurance planning issue. - read more

Why Chronic Illness Is Now a Business Continuity Issue

15 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

New Zurich research has put a sharper lens on a risk many business owners already sense in their teams and families: Australians are living longer, but more of those years may be affected by chronic illness. For SMEs, this is not only a health story. It is a continuity, productivity and financial resilience story. - read more

What Canstar’s 2026 Life Insurance Ratings Mean for Key Person Cover

15 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Canstar’s latest 2026 life insurance research has put fresh numbers around a familiar pressure point for Australians: premiums are still rising, even if the increase is relatively modest. Based on Canstar’s direct life insurance rating work, average life insurance costs were reported to be $14.60, or 0.84%, higher in 2026 compared with the previous year’s national averages. - read more

ASIC’s Latest Levy Estimates Put Insurance Costs Under the Spotlight

15 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

ASIC’s latest 2025-26 industry funding estimates have put fresh attention on the cost of regulating Australia’s insurance and financial advice sectors. Released on 13 July 2026, the figures show ASIC expects to recover $400.5 million across regulated industries for the financial year, up 19 per cent on the previous year. Final levies are due in December 2026, with invoices expected between January and March 2027. - read more

Why longer lives may mean a rethink on cover

15 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh research from Zurich has put a spotlight on a challenge many Australians may not have fully factored into their insurance planning: we are living longer, but not necessarily living healthier for longer. Its Chronic Care Index ranked Australia eighth among OECD countries for overall health system performance, reflecting strong healthcare capacity and comparatively low mortality. - read more

Click for more Insurance News