Policyholder Triumphs in Machinery Damage Dispute

0

The incident occurred in June 2017 when the glass handling machine tipped over while reversing. A representative from the involved business suggested that the machine's anti-crush functionality might have inadvertently been activated, causing it to lurch and topple under the load of a substantial glass sheet that measured 9.5 metres in height. Speed was also cited as a potential factor.

QBE, the insurer, initially rejected the claim based on assessments from the machine supplier's managing director and their own loss adjuster. These experts contended that the mishap was likely due to the glass panel being lifted off-centre and the boom being set too high during operation.

In contrast, the business's own glass specialist attributed the incident to operator error. Their argument highlighted the challenges in precisely aligning the lifting point with the panel's centre of gravity, particularly as it shifts when the machine rotates.

AFCA's ruling pointed out that, while the glass should normally be lifted at its centre of gravity, as per the machine's manual, the actual situation involved more complex dynamics. The authority found no definitive evidence that not adhering fully to these instructions directly led to the incident, and thus deemed the insurer's exclusion inapplicable. Furthermore, AFCA cast doubt on the supplier's MD's technical conclusions and his potential conflict of interest.

Ultimately, the decision underscores the importance of nuanced technical assessments in insurance disputes and calls for insurers to thoroughly investigate all claims aspects.

Looking forward, this ruling could influence future disputes where operational mishaps intersect with technical manual prescriptions, potentially prompting insurers to revisit their evaluation protocols and company guidance concerning machinery operation claims.

Published:Wednesday, 6th Aug 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Victorian Court Approves $34 Million Add-On Insurance Settlement 08 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori A Victorian court has ratified a $34 million settlement in a class action involving add-on insurance products sold by Suncorp. This settlement culminates the legal proceedings surrounding alleged unlawful sales practices. - read more

Study Bolsters Call to Eliminate Insurance Taxes 07 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori Recent research from Victoria University has provided new insights supporting the proposal to abolish insurance taxes in Australia. The study, conducted by Jason Nassios and James Giesecke, examined the effects of varying rates on four primary taxes: personal income tax, goods and services tax (GST), stamp duties, and insurance duties. Unlike previous studies, this research assessed the economic impacts of these taxes as their rates fluctuated, rather than analyzing them at static levels. - read more

Policyholder Triumphs in Machinery Damage Dispute 06 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori A recent decision in an Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) case has ruled in favour of a business seeking coverage for damage to machinery, despite the hiring company not adhering to all prescribed safety guidelines. The matter involved a Winlet 575 Glass Robot that sustained damage when its stabiliser failed during operation. - read more

IVAA Claims Triumphs in Pitch Competition with Fraud Detection Technology 05 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori In a notable victory, Brisbane-based IVAA Claims emerged as the winner of the esteemed Beyond the Buzzwords pitch contest. The company, which specializes in jewellery validation assessments and settlement guidance for contents claims, impressed the judges with its innovative approach to tackling insurance fraud. - read more

CALI Advocates for Reforms to Bridge Financial Advice Gap for Young Australians 04 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) has highlighted a significant gap in access to affordable, professional life insurance advice among young Australians. A recent study conducted by CALI reveals that only 11% of 18-to-34-year-olds obtain formal financial guidance, with the majority relying instead on advice from informal and often inaccurate sources such as friends, family, social media, and online forums. - read more