Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.

Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.

AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.

The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.

Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.

The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.

“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.

Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.

For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.

Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

What complaint trends mean for life insurance buyers

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent industry attention on insurance complaints is a useful reminder that buying life cover is not only about finding the lowest premium. For New Zealand households, the real test of a policy often comes years later, when a claim is made and the insurer checks whether the policy terms have been met. - read more

Why insurance complaint trends matter before you need to claim

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry attention on insurance complaints is a useful reminder that the real test of any policy comes at claim time. For New Zealand households relying on regular wages, the issue is especially important when the cover is designed to replace income after illness or injury. - read more

What Stronger Conduct Expectations Mean for Income Protection Customers

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

New Zealand’s financial conduct regime continues to reshape expectations for insurers, with the Financial Markets Authority keeping close attention on whether financial institutions can demonstrate fair outcomes for customers. For people who rely on Income Protection Insurance, the shift is more than a compliance story. It affects how policies are explained, how claims are handled, and how insurers monitor whether customers are receiving value from their cover. - read more

Northern Strata Schemes Face Fresh Scrutiny on Cyclone Cover

25 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A fresh review of Australia’s cyclone reinsurance pool has put northern strata insurance affordability back in focus, particularly for apartment buildings and mixed-use schemes exposed to cyclone, flood and storm surge risk. The pool was designed to improve insurer capacity and ease premium pressure in cyclone-prone regions, but the latest discussion suggests that outcomes are still uneven for complex strata properties. - read more

Why Insurance Tax Reform Is Back in Focus for Small Operators

25 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A renewed industry push to reduce or remove state-based insurance taxes has put affordability back in the spotlight for Australian small businesses. For domestic and home service operators, the issue is practical rather than political: when premiums rise, it becomes harder to maintain the cover needed to work safely in clients’ homes, meet contract requirements and protect tools, vehicles and income. - read more

Click for more Insurance News